Greetings,
Just a reminder about what to bring to class tomorrow
1. Your grade sheet, filled out with all your scores, except for grades you are waiting to receive from me. That work will be returned tomorrow.
2. A calculator
3. All your graded work from the semester.
REVISIONS:
If you plan to submit a revision between Thursday and next Friday, the 19th, please follow the instructions I gave on a previous blog.
English 20--Fall 2014
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Thursday, December 4th--5:30 pm
Greetings,
below is a summary of the short lecture I gave on Wednesday. I am including this in the blog because section 8 missed the lecture due to me becoming ill and going home.
II. Interpretive Reading
You have skimmed through the essay briefly in the previous step. Now it is time to read through the entire essay slowly and carefully, reading every single sentence, every single word.
Look for:
--recurring words
--unknown words
--oddly used words
When you encounter passages that are difficult, paraphrase these passages in your own words. Readers do not intellectually possess the subject matter until they make it their own by translating it into their own, familiar terminology.
III. Critical Reading
Here I want to clear up a common misconception. Critical reading is NOT simply doubting everything we read. Critical reading is different than skeptical reading. Critical reading is the deliberate act of testing concepts, trying ideas on for size. A critical reader tries not only to think of arguments to refute what he reads, he tries to think of extra arguments to support it. Only then does he weigh the argument carefully and come to a decision. Rather then merely seeing to "trash" an argument entirely, the wise reader acknowledges that some parts of an argument are more compelling than others, and tries to figure out why.
--Talk back to the text
--Ask questions of the text
--Ask questions about yourself
--Ask questions about context
--Ask questions about broader implications
--Seek relevant connections (so what? Why does it matter?)
IV. Synoptic Reading
Seek confirmation. If the author's argument relies heavily on certain matters of factuality, double chekc to make sure those facts are accurate.
V. Post-Reading
Restate the main argument and the conclusion of the essay in a single sentence. As ad agents say, if you cannot write down the idea on the back of a business card, you probably do not have a clear idea.
below is a summary of the short lecture I gave on Wednesday. I am including this in the blog because section 8 missed the lecture due to me becoming ill and going home.
II. Interpretive Reading
You have skimmed through the essay briefly in the previous step. Now it is time to read through the entire essay slowly and carefully, reading every single sentence, every single word.
Look for:
--recurring words
--unknown words
--oddly used words
When you encounter passages that are difficult, paraphrase these passages in your own words. Readers do not intellectually possess the subject matter until they make it their own by translating it into their own, familiar terminology.
III. Critical Reading
Here I want to clear up a common misconception. Critical reading is NOT simply doubting everything we read. Critical reading is different than skeptical reading. Critical reading is the deliberate act of testing concepts, trying ideas on for size. A critical reader tries not only to think of arguments to refute what he reads, he tries to think of extra arguments to support it. Only then does he weigh the argument carefully and come to a decision. Rather then merely seeing to "trash" an argument entirely, the wise reader acknowledges that some parts of an argument are more compelling than others, and tries to figure out why.
--Talk back to the text
--Ask questions of the text
--Ask questions about yourself
--Ask questions about context
--Ask questions about broader implications
--Seek relevant connections (so what? Why does it matter?)
IV. Synoptic Reading
Seek confirmation. If the author's argument relies heavily on certain matters of factuality, double chekc to make sure those facts are accurate.
V. Post-Reading
Restate the main argument and the conclusion of the essay in a single sentence. As ad agents say, if you cannot write down the idea on the back of a business card, you probably do not have a clear idea.
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
LAST MINUTE REMINDER--Tuesday, December 2, 2014--9 pm
Hello,
Just a quick, last minute reminder to be sure to attach your Viewer's Journal to the back of your out of class essay 3 when you submit it to tomorrow in class.
ALSO, the English dept. requests that professors select a day for student evaluations when it is fairly certain all students will be attending. I chose tomorrow since there is an assignment due. Please make a special effort to attend.
(I will also ask you to complete a course evaluation, but that is just for me. I design it and collect your responses. This will take place on another day)
Just a quick, last minute reminder to be sure to attach your Viewer's Journal to the back of your out of class essay 3 when you submit it to tomorrow in class.
ALSO, the English dept. requests that professors select a day for student evaluations when it is fairly certain all students will be attending. I chose tomorrow since there is an assignment due. Please make a special effort to attend.
(I will also ask you to complete a course evaluation, but that is just for me. I design it and collect your responses. This will take place on another day)
Monday, November 24, 2014
Monday, November 24th--SECOND POSTING OF THE DAY
Greetings,
below is the reading for Packet #10.
below is the reading for Packet #10.
I Won't Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here's Why.
by Kyle Wiens | 8:02 AM July 20, 2012
If you think an apostrophe was one of the 12 disciples of Jesus, you will never work for me. If you think a semicolon is a regular colon with an identity crisis, I will not hire you. If you scatter commas into a sentence with all the discrimination of a shotgun, you might make it to the foyer before we politely escort you from the building.
Some might call my approach to grammar extreme, but I prefer Lynne Truss’s more cuddly phraseology: I am a grammar “stickler.” And, like Truss — author of Eats, Shoots & Leaves — I have a “zero tolerance approach” to grammar mistakes that make people look stupid.
Now, Truss and I disagree on what it means to have “zero tolerance.” She thinks that people who mix up their itses “deserve to be struck by lightning, hacked up on the spot and buried in an unmarked grave,” while I just think they deserve to be passed over for a job — even if they are otherwise qualified for the position.
Everyone who applies for a position at either of my companies, iFixit or Dozuki, takes a mandatory grammar test. Extenuating circumstances aside (dyslexia, English language learners, etc.), if job hopefuls can’t distinguish between “to” and “too,” their applications go into the bin.
Of course, we write for a living. iFixit.com is the world’s largest online repair manual, and Dozuki helps companies write their own technical documentation, like paperless work instructions and step-by-step user manuals. So, it makes sense that we’ve made a preemptive strike against groan-worthy grammar errors.
But grammar is relevant for all companies. Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the internet. In blog posts, on Facebook statuses, in e-mails, and on company websites, your words are all you have. They are a projection of you in your physical absence. And, for better or worse, people judge you if you can’t tell the difference between their, there, and they’re.
Good grammar makes good business sense — and not just when it comes to hiring writers. Writing isn’t in the official job description of most people in our office. Still, we give our grammar test to everybody, including our salespeople, our operations staff, and our programmers.
On the face of it, my zero tolerance approach to grammar errors might seem a little unfair. After all, grammar has nothing to do with job performance, or creativity, or intelligence, right?
Wrong. If it takes someone more than 20 years to notice how to properly use “it’s,” then that’s not a learning curve I’m comfortable with. So, even in this hyper-competitive market, I will pass on a great programmer who cannot write.
Grammar signifies more than just a person’s ability to remember high school English. I’ve found that people who make fewer mistakes on a grammar test also make fewer mistakes when they are doing something completely unrelated to writing — like stocking shelves or labeling parts.
In the same vein, programmers who pay attention to how they construct written language also tend to pay a lot more attention to how they code. You see, at its core, code is prose. Great programmers are more than just code monkeys; according to Stanford programming legend Donald Knuth they are “essayists who work with traditional aesthetic and literary forms.” The point: programming should be easily understood by real human beings — not just computers.
And just like good writing and good grammar, when it comes to programming, the devil’s in the details. In fact, when it comes to my whole business, details are everything.
I hire people who care about those details. Applicants who don’t think writing is important are likely to think lots of other (important) things also aren’t important. And I guarantee that even if other companies aren’t issuing grammar tests, they pay attention to sloppy mistakes on résumés. After all, sloppy is as sloppy does.
That’s why I grammar test people who walk in the door looking for a job. Grammar is my litmus test. All applicants say they’re detail-oriented; I just make my employees prove it.
Read the summary of the #HBRchat on Twitter based on this blog post.
More blog posts by Kyle Wiens
Monday, November 24th, 2014--4 pm
Greetings,
a few things:
Since I will not be able to return your graded out of class essay #2 until Monday, December 1, I do not want you to be concerned about having enough time to revise, if you wish.
I noted earlier in the semester that all revisions must be submitted no later than the last class meeting, which is Wednesday, December 10th.
However! Because of the changed circumstances, I will allow revisions to be submitted no later than the last day of finals week, Friday, Dec. 19th.
Revisions can be submitted to my dept. mailbox in Calaveras 105. If you do place a revision in my mailbox, you must also email me and let me know it is there. I will return the email to let you know that I have received it.
Remember, all students have the option of revising out of class essay 2.
Only students who submitted a rough draft for out of class essay 1 can revise essay 1.
ALSO,
below you will find a sample student response to out of class essay 3. I want you to consider it a fairly strong essay. It earned a high "B". At times, the essay spends too much time summarizing, but overall, the focus and organization and supportive evidence is good.
I will posting at least one more example this week.
a few things:
Since I will not be able to return your graded out of class essay #2 until Monday, December 1, I do not want you to be concerned about having enough time to revise, if you wish.
I noted earlier in the semester that all revisions must be submitted no later than the last class meeting, which is Wednesday, December 10th.
However! Because of the changed circumstances, I will allow revisions to be submitted no later than the last day of finals week, Friday, Dec. 19th.
Revisions can be submitted to my dept. mailbox in Calaveras 105. If you do place a revision in my mailbox, you must also email me and let me know it is there. I will return the email to let you know that I have received it.
Remember, all students have the option of revising out of class essay 2.
Only students who submitted a rough draft for out of class essay 1 can revise essay 1.
ALSO,
below you will find a sample student response to out of class essay 3. I want you to consider it a fairly strong essay. It earned a high "B". At times, the essay spends too much time summarizing, but overall, the focus and organization and supportive evidence is good.
I will posting at least one more example this week.
Walter
White and Heisenberg
“The
concept here being just as your left hand and your right hand are mirror images
of one another, identical and yet opposite,” starts Walter White's lecture on
chirality, “but although they may look the same, they don't always behave the
same.” Throughout the first season
of Breaking Bad, viewers watch the life of Walter White unfold after he
is diagnosed with terminal and inoperable cancer. Walter, who initially appears to be a typical mild mannered
family man and high school chemistry teacher, domineered by his controlling
wife and emasculated by his macho brother-in-law, has a deeply buried side of
himself, a side that viewers come to know as Heisenberg. With these two personalities, we learn
the tragic irony of his lecture on chirality; two men identical in appearance,
but opposite in behavior. Walter
White is submissive, compassionate, and inadequate; Heisenberg is dominant and
clinical.
From
the first scenes of Walter with his family, viewers see Walter being
submissive. He is handed a plate
of breakfast with eggs and bacon in the shape of a five and a zero, for his 50th
birthday. Walter's son, Walt Jr.,
complains that it is not bacon, to which Walter replies, “We're watching our
cholesterol, apparently,” along with the look that he does not like it either,
but is eating it because his wife, Skyler, told him to. Later that day, Walter is at his second
job, as a cashier at a car wash.
His boss, to Walter's dismay, consistently tells him to leave the cash
register and wipe down the cars.
While on his knees, cleaning the wheels of a car, one of Walter's
students looks at him and laughs, taking a photo of Walter with his cellphone. Although humiliated, Walter does not stand
up for himself to either his boss, for making him do work outside his normal
job, or to the student, who is constantly disrespecting him. This humiliation is carried home with
him to his surprise birthday party, where his wife nags him for being
late. That night, for his
birthday, Skyler gives Walter a hand job, barely paying attention, while using
the other hand to work on her laptop.
Throughout that day, Walter puts up with being humiliated, ignored, and scolded
without once doing anything about it.
Even
though most of the people around him do not fully respect him, Walter still
manages to do his best to be a caring and compassionate person. This side of him is perfectly
illustrated by his interactions with Krazy-8. Even though Krazy-8 tried to kill Walter, and is currently
Walt’s prisoner, Walter still brings him food and tries to make his
imprisonment more comfortable by giving him beer and toilet paper. Walter's compassion also comes in the
form of him receiving treatment for his cancer. Originally, Walter was going to cook meth to secure his
family's financial future, but because his family really wants him to go for
treatment, he gives in. This
treatment causes him to be constantly sick and exhausted, but he still does it
because his family wants it.
Walter
White is a genius in the field of chemistry, but very inadequate when it comes
to everything else. While good
with chemistry, Walter is a very bad chemistry teacher; he fails to get the
attention or respect of his students.
While he does care about his students, when he is shown in his classroom,
there is absolutely no one listening to what he is actually saying. This lack of success carries over to
his attempts at cooking meth; while the chemistry portion of the business is
perfect, everything else falls apart.
First, Walter and Jesse try to sell their product to Krazy-8, but Emilio
ends up recognizing Walter from the drug bust; this causes the drug deal to
implode, the aftermath of which is Walter attempting suicide, the RV stuck in a
ditch with two bodies inside, and a brush fire. Next, they try to sell the meth to Tuco, a crazy meth
distributor, but Jesse ends up being robbed and beaten. Their later attempts to kill Tuco
almost result in both Tuco killing them and Hank arresting them. Every time Walt and Jesse take a step
forward, their mistakes set them two steps back.
Heisenberg
is not a new personality of Walter's.
In a flashback, we see the Heisenberg personality talking with Gretchen
about the composition of the human body; we see Heisenberg leaning over
Gretchen, strongly asserting that his way is right. Heisenberg's strongest trait is this dominant presence, most
noticeably around Jesse. This
dominance is first seen when Heisenberg blackmails Jesse into partnering up,
threatening him with jail time unless he helps him sell meth. Once they made their first batch of
meth, Walt and Jesse try to sell it to Krazy-8, and when that situation
implodes, Walter barters his recipe for his life. While in the RV showing them the recipe, Heisenberg is
actually making poison gas, which results in the death of Emilio, and the
incapacitation of Krazy-8. While Walter seems unaffected with being invisible,
Heisenberg risks his life to make sure that they succeed. That same night, after all the mayhem
that the day brought, Heisenberg does not settle for the half-effort handjob,
but instead initiates aggressive sex with Skyler, causing her to ask, “Walt, is
that you?”
The
pinnacle of Heisenberg's dominance comes after Jesse is beaten. Heisenberg calmly walks into Tuco's
office with what appears to be a bag of meth, introducing himself as
Heisenberg; he demands that Tuco give him the money that Tuco promised Jesse
before beating and robbing him.
When Tuco is about to do the same to Heisenberg, he calmly picks up a
rock of the meth, and explains that it is not actually meth. He throws the rock into the ground
causing a massive explosion; he then takes the entire bag and threatens to do
the same. Heisenberg submits and
pays him.
Heisenberg
is not a violent person; he neither enjoys violence or uses it as a first
resort like Tuco. Heisenberg is
clinical, in that he treats situations objectively and emotionally
detached. When dealing
with Krazy-8, he rationalizes letting him go up until he realizes that Krazy-8
has a shard of a broken plate, and is planning on killing him. Heisenberg only resorts to killing
Krazy-8 after learning that Krazy-8 is planning to kill him once freed. When disposing of Emilio and Krazy-8,
he nonchalantly tells Jesse to buy plastic bins for the acid. Heisenberg didn't reassure him about
dissolving human bodies, but gave him simple direct instructions.
These
two personalities are most often at odds with each other; while Walter is
content with being humiliated; Heisenberg, on the other hand, will attack a
display case saying, “Fuck you and your eyebrows, wipe down this,” while
grabbing his genitals. But there
are times when they both work for a common goal. The first time we see this is when jocks are tormenting Walt
Jr. about his disability; viewers see both Walter's fatherly care in defending
his son, and Heisenberg's dominance in assaulting and taunting the jock until
they backed down. A similar event
happens after Jesse is beaten by Tuco, while Walter feels sad and guilty for
sending him to Tuco and wants to fix his mistake, Heisenberg walks into Tuco's
office and ensures that neither himself or Jesse will be harmed in the future.
How
does a man deal with the fate of death? That is what Breaking Bad
attempts to show. In Walter
White's case, he lives. He spends
the little time he has free to be both of himself: the man who will do and put
up with anything for his family, and the man who demands respect and receives
it. Both men make Walter White
whole and compelling because both by themselves would be just another one
dimensional character, but together they showcase a man's struggle with himself
and the world around him.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Thursday, November 20th--11:30 am
Hello,
Below you will find the following:
1. out of class essay assignment #3
2. suggested vocabulary when discussing character traits
3. sample intro paragraphs from essay #3 (to be considered excellent introductions)
4. sample student essay (to be considered a strong, high quality response, as discussed in class)
ALSO, JUST A REMINDER-- when you miss a class, you are responsible for the information you missed. Handouts do not always "cover" everything discussed.
Below you will find the following:
1. out of class essay assignment #3
2. suggested vocabulary when discussing character traits
3. sample intro paragraphs from essay #3 (to be considered excellent introductions)
4. sample student essay (to be considered a strong, high quality response, as discussed in class)
ALSO, JUST A REMINDER-- when you miss a class, you are responsible for the information you missed. Handouts do not always "cover" everything discussed.
English 20, Fall 2014, Instructor: C.
Fraga
Out of Class Essay Assignment #3 (200 points)
Assigned: Wednesday, November 19
Due: Wednesday, December 3
Requirements:
• MLA format
• If you utilize any outside sources (not
required) you must follow MLA format for in- text citations, Works Cited page,
etc.)
At the very least, you must have a
Works Cited page that lists Season 1 of Breaking
Bad. (If you have viewed other seasons, you may use material from them, but
be sure to be clear that your evidence IS from another season)
• Attach your Viewer’s Journal (all 7
entries) to the back of the final draft when submitting. Reminder: if a
Viewer’s Journal is not submitted, 20 points will be deducted from your earned
score. You will not be able to revise
this essay because it is too close to the end of the semester and there will
not be sufficient time to do so.
Before we began viewing the first
season of Breaking Bad, I assigned a Viewer’s Journal. You were to record
your observations and any other notes you wished in order to eventually select
a character to focus on more carefully than others. However, as we have
discussed, your first few journal entries, or perhaps more than a few, might
just be summary plots and notes regarding several different characters.
This Viewer’s Journal will now be a
valuable source as you write your last out of class essay for this course.
Assignment:
Write an in-depth character analysis
of one of the six main characters in the first season of Breaking Bad.
Your essay must include the following:
• Assertion(s) about your character
• Evidence from the episodes that
support your assertions (how did you come to the conclusion(s) you did
regarding this character?)
Your supportive evidence might include but is not limited to:
• what others observe/say (or don’t
observe/say) about the character—either directly or in private
• the actions of the character in
particular situations
• the reactions/responses of the
character in particular situations
• what drives this character
• what terrifies this character
• what pleases this character
• what does this character long for
• what does this character need
Your thesis must be assertive…it is
YOUR opinion as a viewer of these episodes.
· Whether or not you LIKE or DISLIKE this character is not an
issue in this essay.
· Whether you LIKE or DISLIKE the series is also not an issue in
this essay.
Proving to the
reader that this character has the attributes (good, bad, layered, shallow)
that you assert he or she has is your goal.
Keep in mind that your reading audience HAS viewed each of the
seven episodes so avoid writing extensive summaries of each episode.
Your thesis might read something like
this:
Once Walter learns of his terminal
cancer and begins cooking meth, he appears very unstable and irresponsible;
however, his behavior ultimately represents a very determined, loving, highly
intelligent and moral father and husband.
or…
Marie is a very insecure and lonely
woman who is unhappy and uncomfortable living in the shadows of her
power-driven DEA husband and her happily married and very bright sister,
Skylar.
English -----Suggested Vocabulary for Discussing
Character
adaptable daring industrious sensitive
aggressive deceitful insensitive serious
aimless dependent intelligent shallow
alert determined intolerant shrewd
ambitious dishonest jealous sincere
antagonistic disloyal kind sly
boastful disobedient lazy spiritual
bragging energetic loyal sportsmanlike
brave enthusiastic mean stubborn
capable envious mercenary studious
careful extravagant modest sympathetic
careless faultfinding observant sullen
cheerful fearless original tactful
clever frank patient temperate
commanding generous persistent thorough
conceited greedy petty thoughtless
confident helpful practical thrifty
conscientious honest presumptuous tolerant
considerate hopeful proud truthful
cooperative imaginative punctual unfriendly
courageous impatient purposeful ungracious
courteous impulsive reckless unjust
cowardly independent reliable unselfish
credulous indifferent rude vain
cruel indomitable sensible wicked
****************
Sample
intro paragraphs from out of class essay #3
A chameleon uses
camouflage to blend in with its surroundings and to avoid its enemies.
Chameleons are not considered dangerous, and they survive by merely “flying
under the radar.” In the
first season of the television series, Breaking Bad, Jesse
Pinkman is portrayed very similarly to a chameleon. He adapts to situations
that might normally trigger anxiety and convinces himself that everything is
copasetic. He adopts the role of “gangster drug dealer,” in order to blend in with his peers.
Jesse relies on this facade to hide his genuine personality; deep down he is an
insecure, lonely boy who desires the attention and acceptance he did not
receive as a child.
**************************************************************
As soon as
the pants go flying in the first scene of Breaking Bad, the symbolism
begins. The flying pants of the main character Walt -- how he “doesn't wear the
pants” and conversely, how “the pants come off,”-- we are introduced
immediately to strong themes of dichotomy and transition. Outside of the
intelligent writing, the depth and complexity of the characters is also a huge
part of what keeps the audience engaged. Walter White is a perfect example of
why viewers become so addicted to the series: his character is richly developed
and contradictory, and this multifaceted character cleverly travels between two
very dichotomous worlds. In one reality, he is a seemingly submissive “cancer
man” and in another he is a “bad ass” maker of meth.
**********************************************************************
Often when a beautiful piece of art is viewed, the viewer is
transfixed and desires to know even more about the piece. An artist possesses a
certain skill level in order to produce something extraordinary, something that
keeps the audience begging for more. The trouble with being an artist is that
one cannot go back and fix a brush stroke once the work is completed and
framed. In the television series Breaking
Bad, this is the problem Jesse Pinkman faces. As much as he would like to
go back and change his past, he never can, and this shapes the person that he
has become as a young adult. On the exterior, Jesse appears to be a worthless,
uneducated criminal, but beneath the surface he is still a boy who feels
inadequate, searching for the affection he never received from his parents.
AKA Heisenberg
A pushover, a coward, a shell of a man,
extremely passive. These characteristics all describe Walter White, the main
character in Breaking Bad, before his
cancer diagnosis. Walt is
not oblivious to these failings, and they become even more distinct when he
learns he is dying. In episode 1, Jesse asks Walt if he is crazy, and Walt’s
response is, “I’m awake.” The cancer diagnosis wakes him up. Walt goes through
a transformation. This diagnosis becomes a monkey off Walt’s back. No longer is
he confined to the psychological comfort zone he has set for himself; he is now
free to do what he wants, take risks, and pursue his passions, without the fear
of consequences. No longer must he do things the way others want them done, for
he is no longer the ‘yes man’ he once was; he is Hiesenberg, the man he wants
to be, and perhaps always has been inside his soul. Yet with this new found
inner power, there comes a time limit. Walt knows he must accomplish his goals
in a timely manner, and that the clock is ticking, so his options for success
are cut drastically. This ticking clock represents Walt’s motivation, it pushes
him to make quick, life changing decisions, and through these decisions we see
just how deeply layered, and undeniably human, Walter White, AKA Hiesenberg,
really is.
When Walt receives the cancer diagnosis it
devastates him. Walt recollects his life, what he has accomplished, and gets
lost in a swirl of emotions. He feels anger, bitterness, and regret. Walt is a
simple man, a straight shooter who goes with the flow; he has never smoked a
cigarette in his life, yet he has caught lung cancer. Something in him begins
to change; he feels a sense of blandness and lack of excitement in his life,
questioning, is this really it? Walt sees Ken, asshole lawyer, and something
snaps. He realizes it is time to take control, to extinguish himself of the
passive spirit that allows atrocities to manifest in his life, to take action.
He then proceeds to blow up the lawyer’s car, and it feels good. This sense of
control, with a hint of chaos, is something his life has been lacking. He has
been walked over by his boss, his students, his brother in law, and his wife; now
it is his turn to do the walking.
Walt’s first substantial decision post
diagnosis is, how will my family make it once I am gone? Walt is a man who cares deeply for his
family. The thought of leaving them is devastating enough, but the thought of
leaving them helpless and financially unstable is gut-wrenching. Walt has a lot
of pride, when he thinks about his family needing to rely on others for support
because he is not able to carry on his fatherly duties (since he will soon be
dead) it sickens him. Taking hand-outs is not an option; being a charity case
does not sit well with Walter; it must be him and only him who provides a
financially stable future for his family. As he sits by the pool, contemplating
his situation, a chemical reaction occurs in his brain spontaneously with the
spark of the match, chemistry.
Chemistry is Walt’s first love; it is
absolute, it is numbers and certainty, it is everything. There is no guessing with
chemistry. For years Walt did not utilize his knowledge of chemistry to his
full potential, and the match sparking wakes him up to this. Now, instead of teaching,
he will utilize. Walt’s cancer diagnosis causes him to lose his sense of fear,
as well as some morals; therefore, something as dangerous and ethically
questionable as cooking meth becomes a legitimate option. Desperate times call
for desperate measures; how else might he earn large amounts of money in a
short amount of time? It is the ethics and not the danger that causes Walt to
think twice, for he is a man of virtue, and wishes no harm on anyone. Because
of the time constraint, he must act quickly, and so the decision is made to
move forward.
Before Walt progresses to full blown
cook, there are a series of smaller decisions he must make, that give insight
into the depths of his character. Walt is the type of person who pays extreme
attention to detail. Rather than using the internet, or some other means of
research, Walt chooses to go on a ride-along with Hank. This gives him an
opportunity to see the meth business, first hand, from the opposing forces’
point of view. Know thy enemy. Walt also chooses to enlist Jesse, as a
sidekick, to handle the distribution aspects of the business. By having Jesse
between him and the customers, he provides a cushion, not only from the dangers
of distributing, but so that he may not witness the devastation his product
creates. This is an example of how his morals play a part in Walt’s decision
making. He knows what he is doing is morally wrong, so in order to feel
comfortable continuing, he must avoid circumstances which remind him of his
wrong doing. By only being the cook, he feels less responsible for the plight
of his product.
Because of the time limitations posed
by the cancer, Walt does not always think through his decisions, leading to
many unintended consequences. When Walt steals the chemistry equipment from his
school, an innocent man is blamed. This situation hurts Walt, especially since
he was fond of the janitor. Other, harsher circumstances occur as well. When
Walt sends Jesse to talk to Krazy 8, he is not expecting Jesse to return with
the clientele. When he is holding the door to the RV shut, while Krazy 8 and
his cousin are dying, Walt is almost crying. Walt does not want to kill
anybody, yet through quick decision making, it seems to be a recurring event. It
is either them or him; he makes sure it is most definitely them. Walt knows
that if he dies before accomplishing his goals, he fails his family, and to
fail his family is to fail himself. Failure is not an option.
Walt’s dedication to his family is clear
throughout his decisions, but to say he does not make decisions for himself, as
well, would be inaccurate. Walt chooses to mislead his wife, but he does so
with good intentions. Walt knows that his wife does not understand his pride.
When his former colleague, Elliott, offers to pay for his treatments, Walt
declines. To accept their offer is to give up on himself. As much as Walt needs to have his
family financially stable after his death, he needs to be the one who provides
the stability. The reason Walt stashes the money in his daughter’s room is to
convince himself that he is breaking bad strictly for his family; he does not
want to believe he is doing it for himself.
Walt’s use of chemistry, as a means to
progress, is not limited to cooking meth. Similar to the hammer of Thor,
chemistry becomes Walt’s secret weapon (Thor).
The use of chemistry gives Walt a sense of power, something he has lacked thus
far in his life. Walt begins to utilize chemistry to overcome obstacles, and
for each time the use of chemistry is a success, his confidence in chemistry is
elevated. This is where Walt truly begins to manifest his Hiesenberg character.
As Walt’s choices lead him down a path
full of destruction and chaos, he must create a distinct separation between himself
and his actions. Hiesenberg is that separation. By putting on the hat and
glasses, Walt is able to let go of any inhibitions and calmly execute his
mission. Hiesenberg is the polar opposite of Walter White; where Walter is soft
and timid, Hiesenberg is firm and direct. There are repercussions to using Hiesenberg
though, as Hiesenberg follows a different moral code than Walt. Where Walt is
in it for his family and pride, Hiesenberg wallows in money, power, and
respect. Using Hiesenberg gives Walt a rush, so much so that it becomes like an
addiction, similar to the rush Spider Man gets when he dons his black suit (Spider Man 3). As Hiesenberg, Walt
begins to make choices he normally would not make. Money and power begin to be
Walt’s objective, almost on the same level as providing a financial future for
his family.
In episode 5, when it is Walt’s turn
with the pillow, he says, “All I have left is how I choose to approach this.” Walter’s
story seems original, yet it fits the basic structure of the classic hero’s journey
(Campbell). Walt is a simple man, who is served a cancer diagnosis, which sends
him on his journey. He is given a weapon, chemistry, to protect himself. He has
Jesse, a partner with hindsight, to help him on his way. He travels into the
belly of the beast, Tuco’s hideout, and emerges stronger -- a changed man. Walt,
having to make decisions and live with the consequences, is what makes him such
a relatable character; he makes mistakes; he has emotional highs and lows; he
has psychological issues, and he is trying to be successful against all odds.
Walt is neither good nor evil. He is both; he is human.
Works Cited
Breaking Bad: The Complete First Season. Writ. Vince Gilligan. Sony
Pictures Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with
a Thousand Faces. Novato: New
World Library, 2008. Print.
Spider Man 3. Dir. Sam Raimi. Touchstone Pictures,
2007. DVD.
Thor. Dir. Kenneth Branagh. Paramount Pictures, 2011. DVD.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)